Adultery Marriage Agreement
Human rights organizations have stated that legislation on sexual crimes must be based on consent and recognize consent as central and not minimize its importance; Otherwise, it can lead to legal, social or ethical abuses. In condemning stoning laws, which include adultery, Amnesty International spoke of “acts that should never be criminalized in advance, including consensual sexual relations between adults.”  Salil Shetty, Secretary General of Amnesty International, said: “It is incredible that in the 21st century some countries tolerate children and rape, while others prohibit abortion, sex outside marriage and homosexual sexual activity – even punishable by death.”  The “My Body My Rights” campaign condemned state control over individual sexual and reproductive decisions; “People around the world are being forced, criminalized and discriminated against simply because they make decisions about their bodies and their lives.”  But can a marriage be protected from infidelity? Some spouses and divorce lawyers believe that the infidelity clause is the antidote to adultery. It is significant that the biblical penalty does not apply to sex if the woman is not married, otherwise it applies regardless of the marital status of the man. In other words, if the man was married when the woman was not, there would be no death penalty for adultery among these passages. A marriage in which both spouses agree in advance to accept sexual relations of one of the partners with others is sometimes called open marriage or swinging lifestyle. Polyamory, that is, the practice, desire or acceptance of intimate relationships that are not exclusively related to other sexual or intimate relationships, with the knowledge and consent of all parties involved, sometimes involves such marriages. Vibrant and open marriages are both a form of non-monogamy, and spouses would not consider sex offensive. Despite the views of partners, extramarital relationships can still be considered crimes in some judicial systems that criminalize adultery. Before adding an abuse provision to a marriage contract, the couple must think carefully about how this is defined. Texas defines domestic violence and child abuse, but not adult divorce-related abuse. If a marriage ends in divorce, there will be arguments. What one considers an intense argument could be perceived by the other as abusive.
Before an abusive provision is included in a marriage contract, careful consideration should be given. A flexible definition will encourage disputes in the event of divorce. Historically, in most cultures, anti-adultery is legislated just to prevent women – not men – from having sex with someone other than their spouses, because women were considered the property of their husbands, adultery being often defined as sexual intercourse between a married woman and a man other than her husband. [Citation required] Among many cultures, punishment – and until today, as has been said below – is the death penalty. At the same time, men were free to maintain sexual relations with women (Polygyny), provided that women had not yet had husbands or “owners”. In fact, Hebrew is used for the husband, Hebrew for the husband, used throughout the Bible, synonymous with owner. These laws were enacted out of fear of Cuckoldry and therefore of sexual jealousy. Many Aboriginal customs, such as female genital mutilation and even the menstrual stick have been described as preventive measures against Cuckolding. This regulation has been denounced by many modern intellectuals. According to Pennsylvania family law lawyer Jeffrey Kash, the subject is not common in his office, but these agreements are applicable in his state.